Thursday, January 29, 2009

Big 4 among Fortune's 100 Best Companies To Work For

Fortune Magazine announced its version of TOP 100 BEST COMPANIES TO WORK FOR.

No doubt, the Big 4 companies are within the top list. BUT, at what rankings? As a Big 4 employee, I wish the rankings could be higher. According to the rankings, we have to acknowledge - there are still plenty of companies which can offer better alternative than job at Big 4 )).

One of the survey parts is a rating called BIG PAY. Of course, Big 4 is still there but unfortunately - NOT within TOP 10.
The highest rank out of Big 4 in Big Pay rating is taken by E&Y:
Ernst&Young #36 (Manager - a client-serving position - $103,164)
Pricewaterhousecoopers #46 (Manager/Supervisor - $95,082),
Deloitte #57 (Senior / Senior Consultant - $83,488) and
KPMG #66 (Senior Associate - $75,000).

Being a non-US citizen, I wish these levels of salaries were standard all over the world, as they differ significantly (several times) from other regions right now.

Coming back to the TOP LIST, we have to thank FORTUNE for the column Job Growth. And what do we have here?

Pricewaterhousecoopers is a leader in staff layoffs - minus 2%! KPMG - zero growth.

Analyzing this statistics, we have to bear in mind that all companies were recruiting people in the beginning of the year (at least + 10% globally) - therefore - we can imagine the level of staff layoffs within the companies ((.

Source: Fortune

Sunday, January 25, 2009

New recruiting video from Deloitte: Who are we?

Saturday, January 24, 2009

KPMG flooded with calls on Empire Direct

Electrical retailer Empire Direct has gone into administration. The Leeds-based chain's 14 warehouse shops and online store are shut as it was unable to trade in administration because of low stock levels. The firm's collapse means 150 jobs have been lost.

Mark Firmin and Richard Fleming of KPMG LLP have been appointed by the High Court as joint administrators. They are trying to work out what the situation is for customers who have paid for goods but not received them.

The company was one of the few alternatives to DSGi brands like Currys and PC World, which are having their own problems. The company turned over about £150m a year and had been trading for 25 years.

A customer telephone line set up on Tuesday by KPMG to deal with those enquiring about collapsed Empire Direct is receiving 1,000 calls a day.

Joint administrator Mark Firmin said he was aware the situation was ‘regrettable’ for many Empire Direct customers.

Customers have been inundating the line with calls after being told they would not receive refunds or goods ordered from the electronic goods retailer, which went into administration on Monday blaming bad economic conditions for its demise.

Empire’s terms and conditions state that the customer does not take ownership of goods ordered until delivery or collection

Any money paid by customers went into the company’s overdrawn bank account.

KPMG said there are 5,800 customers who have paid for goods that they have not yet received. Of these, 4,800 paid by card and, through the use of banking industry data, it is estimated that just over 4,000 of these will be able to claim a refund from their card issuer.

Remaining customers will become unsecured creditors of the company, and can file a claim with the administrators, though a dividend is unlikely.

No further redundancies have been announced, and administrators are said to be continuing attempts to sell the business’s assets, having received over 159 expressions of interest from potential buyers.

Sources: Accountancy
The Register

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

The Best Accounting Firms to work for - 2008 (US)

Accounting Today announced results of its recent survey.

The big news is: None of The Big 4 companies deserves to be the best to work for!

Nearly 200 firms from across the country (US) applied and entered a two-part survey process, but ONLY 60 accounting firms have been honored as the Best Firms to Work For by Accounting Today.

KPMG - Rank 8
Ernst&Young - Rank 14

What makes an accounting firm a great employer? Is it exceptional benefits? Flex time? Opportunities for advancement?As you might expect, the tactics that make for success vary from firm to firm; however, one value underlies them all - a genuine "people-first" attitude.

Source: WebCPA

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

F**ked up?

Monday, January 12, 2009

PwC audit in spotlight after $1bn fraud at Indian outsourcer

Accounting fraud by Satyam chairman is being called 'India's Enron'.

PricewaterhouseCoopers has said it will cooperate fully with regualtors after a $1bn accounting fraud was uncovered at its audit client Satyam Computer Services, one of India's largest offshore outsourcers.

The chairman of Satyam, Ramalinga Raju, one of India's largest outsourcing providers, has resigned after admitting to inflating profits by about $1bn (£682m) over a number of years.

The fraud, which has been described as 'India's Enron', has rocked the country's outsourcing industry.

In a statement, Pricewaterhouse India said:

'The audits [of Satyam] were conducted by Price Waterhouse in accordance with applicable auditing standards and were supported by appropriate audit evidence. ''Given our obligations for client confidentiality, it is not possible for us to comment upon the alleged irregularities. Price Waterhouse will fully meet its obligations to cooperate with the regulators and others.'
Satyam's share price collapsed by more than 60% after its fraud emerged, and reports claimed that Merrill Lynch has terminated its contract with the company.

Investors of Satyam, embroiled in a billion-dollar fraud scandal, are demanding to know why auditors from PricewatehouseCoopers failed to detect the accounting irregularity.

PwC's role in the Satyam scandal is set to be investigated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India, the markets watchdog, and the Indian government's anti-corruption office, the Times reported.

Only ten days after being brought in by the company to explore merger opportunities, Merril Lynch found that the books did not balance. PwC India has been handling Satyam's audit since 2000.
When PwC's affiliate in Japan, ChuoAoyama, found itself embroiled in a scandal not only did it suffer a two month ban from auditing by the country's financial watchdog, its clients started to leave in droves. PwC was so concerned it revealed plans to open a new Tokyo firm using the PwC brand.

This was hugely damaging for the business in Japan but the firm, internationally, was unaffected.
Likewise when Grant Thornton International got caught up in Italy's Parmalat scandal, the chief executive David McDonnell unceremoniously dumped the Italian network member Grant Thornton Spa.
Both actions appeared to stop the reputational contagion spreading to the rest of the firm. Unlike, of course, with Andersen once the Enron explosion took place.
So, the question is: if it really turns sour for PwC in India what effect will it have on the rest of the firm worldwide?

So here's a prediction. The Satyam debacle could be horrible for PwC in India. But even if it turns out to be bigger than the $1bn being touted, and the auditor involved in some inappropriate way (though once again there is no way of concluding that at the moment) the effect on PwC worldwide will be negligible.

Source: Accountancy Age

Friday, January 9, 2009

Big Four Firms Combined Revenues Top $100B, Employment Nearly 600,000!

The five years from 2004 to 2008 have been some of the best growth years for these firms. In a strong economic environment, with rapid development in the BRIC nations and solid growth in emerging markets, the Big Four firms capitalized on demand for global financial and accounting services to boost their top line and posting a string of back-to-back record performances.

Growth in Brazil, Russia, India and China was reported at nearly 30+ % each year, as these economies expressed their latent need for professional services.

In 2008, the combined revenues of the Big4 firms, Deloitte & Touche, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers crossed a major landmark – the $100 billion barrier. 2008 revenues were a solid $103 billion, up 15.4% from 2007, and capping a streak of sequential double digit revenue increases each year since 2004, when the combined revenue was only $60 billion.

The Asia region for the Big Four firms nearly doubled from 2004 to 2006, and Asia’s share of total revenues increased from 12% to 13% in this period. Surprisingly, the European region continues to be the largest geographic region for the Big Four firms. Europe accounted in 2008 for 48% of total combined revenues, up from 46% in 2004. America’s share slipped considerably, dropping from 42% of combined total revenues in 2004 to 39% of combined total revenues in 2008. Highly-developed countries of US and Canada had more modest needs for professional services provided by the Big Four firms.

The traditional mix of the Big Four firms moved slightly away from pure audit to more tax and advisory services as they increased revenues at a faster clip. By service line, combined Audit revenue for 2008 was $53 billion, 52% of the total combined revenue, slipping 2% from its 54% share in 2006. Combined Tax revenue was $25 billion, 25% of the total in 2008, rising 2% from 23% in 2006. Advisory services accounted for $26 billion, 25% of total in 2008, rising 2% from 23% in 2006.

The Big4 firms employed a staggering 590,000 professionals in 2008, increasing from 435,000 in 2004, providing a net employment increase of 155,000 in just five years. In 2008, of this, there were 33,580 global partners, 443,522 professionals and 112,817 administrative personnel. Partners are placed atop a steep pyramid in these firms, partners comprised only 5.7% of total employees, professionals being the bulk at 76% and support staff comprising the balance at 19%. The Big4 firms continue to push the professionals to partner ratio, which has increased sharply from 11.1 in 2004 to 13.2 in 2008. Not only do partners manage a larger set of professionals, they are also expected to bring in larger chunks of client business, with revenue per partner rising from $2.1 million in 2004 to $3.1 million in 2008.

KPMG’s financial year ended in September 2008, a full one quarter after the other firms, and it felt more the crushing weight of the global financial credit crunch. Despite this, its revenue increased 15.4%, somewhat slower than Ernst & Young and Deloitte & Touche, but creditable nonetheless. PricewaterhouseCoopers continues to be the largest firm by revenue, with Deloitte close behind by only $800 million, conceivably Deloitte could become the top dog in a short while if it keeps up its strong rate of growth. Thus, 2009 promises to be an interesting year both for growth prospects and for gaining the top spot.
Undoubtedly, as a group, the Big Four firms occupy a significant position on the global economic landscape, with $100+ revenues, high profitability, deep global reach and as a large employer of highly talented professionals. This year has provided us with quite unbelievable numbers and the party does not seem to be over yet.

Source: Big4.com